The Sweeney Lawsuit

Unchecked Power: The Sweeney Lawsuit and What It Reveals About Former Judge Christine Carringer

We’ve been hearing about the federal lawsuit against former Solano County Judge Christine Carringer. This lawsuit’s claims go beyond legal disagreements to address a system that allegedly allowed a judge to use her power to destroy a family’s livelihood and violate their rights.

This lawsuit, filed by John Donnelly Sweeney and Jennifer Frost, exposes a disturbing pattern of behavior and a shocking amount of unchecked power.


A Judge’s Power Under Fire

The lawsuit seeks over $650 million in damages and demands the return of two properties, Point Buckler Island and Chipps Island. The plaintiffs allege that the judge’s actions were part of a “25-year conspiracy of environmental fraud, corruption, and the deliberate destruction of a family’s livelihood.”

Among the serious claims against Judge Carringer are:

  • She allegedly blocked the family’s legal representation on multiple occasions, denying them a fundamental right to an attorney.
  • She wrongfully denied legal challenges and canceled a property deed without proper authority.
  • She allegedly ordered and approved a “sham sheriff’s sale” of their property.
  • She is accused of using warrants to intimidate and threaten the plaintiffs, with an order for their arrest.

The plaintiffs are fighting back, stating that the judge’s actions violated their constitutional rights and show a clear abuse of power.


The Judge’s Defense and What It Really Means

In response, Judge Carringer’s team is trying to get the lawsuit dismissed by arguing that a judge is immune from being sued for actions performed as part of their job. She also claims the federal court can’t review her decisions.

This defense shows a judge who believes she is above accountability. It’s the ultimate act of judicial arrogance, attempting to preserve power and escape consequences by claiming that the very system put in place to oversee the judiciary cannot question her actions.

This case is a stark reminder that we must not tolerate a legal system where judges can allegedly act with impunity, destroying families and livelihoods in the process.